Imr 4350 vs h4350.

Jan 26, 2019 · I have not tried IMR 4350, but I have tried h4350, AA 4350, RL 16, IMR 4451 and Superformance. I found good loads with each of these powders, but it takes a lot of time and of course a lot of money. I ran my first ladder of Accurate 4350 yesterday with decent success, but I haven't reached 2700 f/s that my guns like in H4350. Apr 8, 2021. #19. 4350 and re 19 are too fast burning for all but 100 gn bullets in the 7 mag if you want to achieve full capability of the case. the 4831s are good for 120 gns. imr 7828 was designed for 7 mag facory ammo, so that gives a bit of a guide for most used bullets in 7 mag. re22 is a little faster than that.Joined: Nov 2008. Posts: 4,851. I also have had a long “relationship” with IMR 4350 and H4831 (short cut also), as well as H4350 as long as it’s been produced. I have found that H4831SC gives me the highest accuracy with the .270 Winchester and 130 gr. bullets in all of the eight .270s I have owned.Difference between H4350 and IMR4350? Can someone that has …Anyone have any pressure issues with Imr4350 in 260 rem ? Kinda scratching my head. I have a trg 22 with a new bartlien barrel. Got about 150 rounds through it. During ladder tests I would find a good mild node to load up around 41.9 gr, lapua brass federal primers . 139 lapua bullets .

There could be a large gap between the 2 powders , but you can't tell by looking at the chart. H4350 does handle the temperature changes better but don't try to cross over your powder charges to IMR 4350. The new H4350 is a drastically different powder from what people knew from years ago of the barrel burner that IMR 4350 used …Today, we have H4350 (Hodgdon) and AA 4350 (Accurate Arms) available in addition to the IMR version. In this case, the propellant burn rates are much more alike ...

Sep 26, 2022 · 7mm-08 Remington: "You cannot beat 47.0 to 50.0 grains of H-4350 and any bullet around 140 grains in Remington’s little update of the classic 7x57mm Mauser. Some bullets are longer and grabbier so will only take the lighter charge, but Hornady’s 139 grainer will take 50.0 grains. Oct 16, 2022 · The 180 Gr is on the heavy side for the 7RM, H-4350 is probably a too fast burning powder for that bullet weight. A more appropriate powder would be IMR-8133, Ramshot Magnum ,even Retumbo. With these slower burning powders make sure your neck tension is set properly, this will help with inconsistent velocity’s, CBTO will also aid a lot.

The composition varies between IMR 4350 and H4350, influencing factors …Boolit Master. Join Date. Mar 2005. Location. Nashvegas, TN. Posts. 1,386. I loaded IMR4350, H4831, and RE19 in my 30/06's and .300 WSM for years until I tried Big Game and Hunter last year. In 3 different rifles all had equal or better accuracy with better velocity and standard deviation using the Ramshot powders.Feb 10, 2009. #4. The 2008 hodgdons manuel lists imr 4350 as 91 st on a burn rate scale with h4350 as 92nd, it also lists a starting load for a 180 gr 30-06 as 52 gr h 4350 and 53 gr of imr 4350 .so starting with a low end load should be safe. 300 win mag 180 gr. starting imr 4350 63 gr imr 4350 66 gr.Alex. 3.Buy IMR 4350 directly from IMR. IMR 4350 is a medium- to slow-burn rate propellant & is the number one choice for Remington and Winchester new short ...

H4350 worked a lot better. Got 182 fps better velocity and sub half inch three shot groups from my new Barrett Fieldcraft using 168 gr Bulldozers. Loads were lightly compressed. I should try the IMR 4451 since its burn rate is a little faster the H4350, so it could also work well in the '06.

Javascript is required. Please enable javascript before you are allowed to see this page.

Hodgdon 4350 vs imr 4895 in 30-06 savage axis. I ran into an issue with 2 loads and am on a hunt for answers. 46gr imr4895 with 165gr nosler ballastic tip. 57gr h4350 with 165 gr hornady sst After 100 yard zero with hornady sst, i decided to compare the nosler and the nosler hit 5" higher. I know there's a ballistic coefficient difference and ...Feb 28, 2009 · Banana Belt, Montana. As I already noted here, Hunter works great in the .270. Ramshot's own data lists 55.3 grains as max with a Sierra 150. It works fine with 100's in the .250-06, but the Ramhot powder for 115-120 grain bullets in the .25-06 is Magnum. Around 60 grains is maximum in their data, for around 3100+ fps. I have heard that H4350 is a little slower than IMR 4350. If that is the case, I assume that the H4350 would result in lower pressures than IMR 4350 for the same charge weight. So, let say I have a pressure tested load out of the Nosler manual that gave 3250 fps using a 150 grain Partition out of a 7mm Rem Mag with a certain charge of IMR 4350.45.5 grains of IMR 4350 and Nosler's 100 grain ballistic tip spell death for Montana mulies. ... It was plain wrap RPs vs. +P. The plus Ps always ...Aug 23, 2017 · 63. I have found a noticeable difference in temp stability between IMR and H4350, the latter being much more stable over a wide temp range. I hunt in temps ranging from 25-75F through the season. As mentioned, it's not much of an issue until you start shooting past 500 yards. Apr 8, 2021. #19. 4350 and re 19 are too fast burning for all but 100 gn bullets in the 7 mag if you want to achieve full capability of the case. the 4831s are good for 120 gns. imr 7828 was designed for 7 mag facory ammo, so that gives a bit of a guide for most used bullets in 7 mag. re22 is a little faster than that.As I already noted here, Hunter works great in the .270. Ramshot's own data lists 55.3 grains as max with a Sierra 150. It works fine with 100's in the .250-06, but the Ramhot powder for 115-120 grain bullets in the .25-06 is Magnum. Around 60 grains is maximum in their data, for around 3100+ fps.

Hodgdon H4350. Hodgdon H4831. Hodgdon H4831SC. Hodgdon H870. Hodgdon Hybrid 100V. Hodgdon Retumbo. Hodgdon SUPERFORMANCE ... Hodgdon Varget. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4064. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4350. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4451. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4831. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4895. Improved Military …Bullet: 168 grain Speer Gold Match BTHP. Brass: WW Virgin. Primer: Winchester LR mag. Temp: 20 degrees F. Range Cond: 100 yards, flat light on snow. 73.0 grains, IMR 4350= 3,190 fps, ES 10 fps and a 0.48 inch group. 73.0 grains, H 4350 = 3,120 fps, ES 40 fps and a 1.5 inch group. The difference in group size really surprised me....I’m using IMR4350 with great results, 41.6 grains and 143 gr Hornady ELD-X is averaging .56 inch for a 5 shot group at 100 yards. I’m also having good luck with RL16 and 140 gr Speer Gold Dots. Only one …I actually switched from imr 4350 to h4350 as a price and availability issue. And yeah, this was before the 6.5 Creedmore, and the swarm of guys who will use nothing else in it. Nowadays I can find either A4350 or imr 4350 at least a …Cfe223, H380, and H414 are the ones I have that are in between varget and H4350. These are in order of burn rate . Reactions: ranger3, dantiff2 and Mark W. MrMajestic. Silver $$ Contributor. Jul 30, 2016 #9 ... IMR 4350= 0.5150 Hodgdon H4350= 0.5130 NORMA 201= 0.5110 Accurate 2700= 0.5060 Hodgdon Hybrid 100V= 0.4905 IMR …Last year, top F-Class shooter Rick Jensen did a comparison between H4350 and IMR 4451, shooting the two powder in a wide range of temperatures. His data suggests that both powders show good temp stability. Powder Comparison Test: H4350 vs. IMR 4451 Rick Jensen, Captain of the U.S. F-Open Rifle Team, has tested some of the new IMR 4451 powder.

Hodgdon 4350 vs imr 4895 in 30-06 savage axis. I ran into an issue with 2 loads and am on a hunt for answers. 46gr imr4895 with 165gr nosler ballastic tip. 57gr h4350 with 165 gr hornady sst After 100 yard zero with hornady sst, i decided to compare the nosler and the nosler hit 5" higher. I know there's a ballistic coefficient difference and ...IMR4350 / H4350. Getting ready to start loading for my new to me 7mm-08. Nosler 120g BT's are the bullets I want to use. Nosler starting load with this bullet is 45g of IMR4350 / 49g max. Nosler has no data for H4350. Hodgdon starting load with the same bullet is 48g of H4350 / 50g max. Hodgdon has no data for IMR4350.

63 Reaction score 0 Location Fairbanks Alaska Feb 10, 2009 #1 I have been researching the feasability of using H4350 in place of IMR 4350 in some of my reloads. I see that the burn rates etc are almost identical. I would like to hear others thoughts/experiances with using H4350 in place of IMR 4350 B BrownBear New member Joined Apr 25, 2006Dec 17, 2012 · 450. IMR4350 is a single based powder, as is H4350, all powders are a bit temp sensative (yes even the extreme powders, the moniker is a marketing ploy) double based powders are more temp sensative due to the addition of nitroglycerin into the make-up. book max loads are safe with 4350 if the temp is below 120F. Jul 4, 2011 · H 4350 is AR 2209. When first released in the 80's, it was a about 5% faster than IMR 4350. When ADI got the contracts of supply to Hodgdon, it changed the burning rate to slightkly slower than IMR which hurt no-one and made the powder more flexible in a lot of magnums so it was an improved product in the market place. This is probably a dumb question, but I was wanting to buy some IMR-4350 powder for reloading my .270 with 130 grain bullets. The store didn't have any but had H4350 powder, so I bought a can of that. I was wondering if I could use the same amount (53.5 grains) with 130 grain bullets, as I...L. Joined: May 2005. Posts: 6,393. Pikeville, TN. It is close, but not identical to either. I used it with good results for a while before standardizing on H4350. Re: Accurate 4350 vs IMR 4350. kenster99 # 9305568 11/02/14. Joined: Oct 2014.Sep 3, 2021. #9. Veteran said: Those burn rate charts are relative and qualitative but not quantitative at all. Yes, it shows Accurate 4350 as slower than IMR 4350 and H4350, both if which have a quantitative burn rate of about 0.51. But Accurate 4350 has a numerical burn rate of only about 0.38.Ahhh just checked the powder stock and nope :-[ I did find a nearly full tub of IMR 4350 but the IMR 4831 tin is just about empty as is the Reloader 19. The H4350 is a new tub originally brought to service the .243 Winchester and bearing in mind the horrendus price of powder here now.IMR 4350 Winchester CCI 200 54.0 2501 58.0 Vihtavuori N540 Winchester CCI 200 43.0 2598 47.0 Alliant Reloder 22 Winchester CCI 200 58.0 2530 62.0 C Hodgdon H4350 Winchester CCI 200 54.0 2489 58.0 C Hodgdon H414 Winchester CCI 250 52.0 2520 56.0 Hodgdon H380 Winchester CCI 250 51.0 2544 55.0 Hodgdon Varget Winchester CCI …I am using IMR 4350 with 140 Accubonds . Aug 26, 2020 ... H4350 vs. IMR4350. jjohnsonElknewbie; Apr 2, 2023 ... Accurate 4350 in 6.5 Creed - Experiences. nobody;

May 3, 2009 · Hodgdon H4350 powder CCI LR Mag primers or Rem 9 1/2 LR Mag Primers Sierra 180 Gr. Gameking bullets I also have some IMR 4830 but only a couple pounds. I have a full 8 lbs of 4350 so I would like to find a load using it.

Feb 14, 2022 · IMR4350 / H4350. Getting ready to start loading for my new to me 7mm-08. Nosler 120g BT's are the bullets I want to use. Nosler starting load with this bullet is 45g of IMR4350 / 49g max. Nosler has no data for H4350. Hodgdon starting load with the same bullet is 48g of H4350 / 50g max. Hodgdon has no data for IMR4350.

The Sniper's Hide App is here! Download the app DOWNLOAD. Hey fellas, I'm new here but hope I'll have a little to offer to the community as time goes on.. I'm very much a student of the game like most of you.. a master of nothing except bating ;) Anyways this is a fairly newer offering to the best of my knowledge and very affordable. SW4350, I ...H4831SC performed the best in my old 338WM w/ a 24" barrel. After testing H4350, IMR 4350 and Ramshot Hunter in my rifle, 4831SC was the most consistent. I went straight to it for my new 26" 338WM and it didn't disappoint. The "SC" flows fine in my Redding LR-1000.Write a review. $49.99 - $374.99. Quantity: 1. Powder Size. Size. Bullet Type. *Image may not represent product selected. A stand-out choice for new short magnums, IMR® 4350 powder comes specially designed for use with lightweight or medium-weight bullets. It works superbly with both Remington and Winchester models.Man I love IMR 4350. Ive used it forever in 6x47, 6.5x55, 7WSM and 300 WM. The internet hates it, but it not only shoots well, you can find it all the time while the fanboys are buyin up the H4350! Regards DTCan you guys tell me the difference if any? I have used IMR in my .270 with excellent results but have wondered if switching to H would be an advantage of.Jan 12, 2020 · I am having issues finding H4350 my Lyman manual shows very similar performance with IMR and I think all IMR powders are suppose to have some copper fouling inhibitor in them. So what is the difference does anyone have a history with the IMR powders? Savage 12BVSS Well-Known Member Joined Dec 20, 2019 Messages 1,067 Location Maine Jan 12, 2020 #2 Based on the Hodgdon site info for the 4350 powders compared in the same conditions try dropping Barnes IMR data 2.0gr on both ends, (61.5gr - 68.0gr) I have shot the 338WM with a 210 Partition and 74.0gr of RL-19 with good results. I haven't tried the Barnes bullets in the 338WM in any combination. 3.Both propellants and a couple of others work well with .25-06, but weight of bullet changes things somewhat. IMR 4350 is great & gives more MV than H 4350 with a 100gn bullet, but shift the bullet weight upward & IMR 4831 could be a better performer. IMR4350 is faster than Viht. N160. Powder Burn Rate Comparison Chart @ www.reloadersnest.com.

Jan 12, 2020 · I've been using mostly Accurate 4350.I did a test on all three using same charge and bullet.Accurate 4350 gave me just little tighter group with the best velocity.IMR-4350 was close in velocity with just a little larger group.H-4350 was a bit slower by around 20-30fps slower than the other two and came in second to the Accurate 4350 in group size. Mar 13, 2019 · Man I love IMR 4350. Ive used it forever in 6x47, 6.5x55, 7WSM and 300 WM. The internet hates it, but it not only shoots well, you can find it all the time while the fanboys are buyin up the H4350! Regards DT In researching a powder starting point for loads I see H4350 and H4831 mentioned the most. Heres the reason for my question, I have a lot of IMR4350 on hand as its the powder of choice in my 7mm-08 and 260. I know the H4350 is more temp tolerant but wonder if working up a load with the powder I have (IMR4350) would be very similar to the H4350.450. IMR4350 is a single based powder, as is H4350, all powders are a bit temp sensative (yes even the extreme powders, the moniker is a marketing ploy) double based powders are more temp sensative due to the addition of nitroglycerin into the make-up. book max loads are safe with 4350 if the temp is below 120F.Instagram:https://instagram. www cox net webmailwmc5 weathergoddess on olympic medals wsj crossword clue20 day weather forecast nashville tn It's the clear velocity winner for 6.5 CM compared to H4350, if only by a little. Over 2800 fps with 140/142s (like 100 fps above H4350), and almost as fast as SuperFormance and Hybrid100V for the 147s. What really … where is the artifact in boeotiaunemployment benefits iowa log in Joined: Nov 2008. Posts: 4,851. I also have had a long “relationship” with IMR 4350 and H4831 (short cut also), as well as H4350 as long as it’s been produced. I have found that H4831SC gives me the highest accuracy with the .270 Winchester and 130 gr. bullets in all of the eight .270s I have owned. lake rathbun cabins Reply. Save. 1 - 12 of 12 Posts. MontyF · #2 · Jun 14, 2017. Can't answer …Sep 3, 2021. #9. Veteran said: Those burn rate charts are relative and qualitative but not quantitative at all. Yes, it shows Accurate 4350 as slower than IMR 4350 and H4350, both if which have a quantitative burn rate of about 0.51. But Accurate 4350 has a numerical burn rate of only about 0.38.IMR 4350 is a medium- to slow-burn rate propellant and is the number one choice for the new short magnums, both Remington and Winchester versions. For magnums with light- to medium-bullet weights, IMR 4350 is the best choice. IMR recommends always consulting www.IMRReloading.com for the most accurate, up-to-date data. Available in 1-LB and 8-LB containers.